Integrations & UI
Quoted separately
FHIR connectors, review UI, deployment, and validation support outside the AI-core scope.
Same task. Every day. Built once. One repeating bio/med task: blood panels, lab intake, a weekly target screen, or a fixed document type. We build a production pipeline with your validation rules, review queue, and handoff to LIMS, ELN, or your clinical UI. Typical timeline: 3+ weeks.
Worth building when the same task runs every day and generic OCR, chat tools, or research workbenches cannot encode your lab formats, clinical rules, or output schema.
One scoped pipeline: ingest your formats, validate with rules your team already uses, route low-confidence rows to review, write structured output to your systems.
Intro call: we map the recurring task, sample formats, target systems, and compliance context. You get a fixed-scope estimate before any paid work.
You share representative files under NDA. We run a short pass on your real formats and validation rules before contract.
We agree scope, milestones, data-handling terms, and IP in the contract. Work on the AI core starts after the first milestone is paid.
We build the module on agreed scope: normalization, domain validation, confidence routing, system handoff, and audit logging.
Optional phase: FHIR connectors, review UI, production deployment in your environment. Quoted separately if outside the initial scope.
Fixed scope and price for the AI module, agreed before the build starts.
$23,000+
One bio/med pipeline: normalization, validation, review routing, system handoff.
3+ weeks for one focused task; broader scope, longer delivery.
Quoted separately
FHIR connectors, review UI, deployment, and validation support outside the AI-core scope.
Final module price depends on format variety and handoff depth. Deliverables are fixed during the domain validation pass before contract.
R[AI]SING SUN builds one production pipeline per scoped task: blood panels, lab intake, a recurring screen, or a fixed document loop. The module covers format normalization, domain validation, review routing, structured handoff, and audit logging. Co-founder background in molecular biology and diagnostics informs architecture choices.
Anthropic tools are built for exploration, literature, and open-ended analysis in a chat or workbench. A custom module fits when the same task repeats daily with your lab formats, clinical rules, and LIMS schema. You need production routing, audit trails, and deployment in your environment, not a general research assistant.
The AI module starts from €20,000, $23,000 USD, or £17,000 GBP for fixed scope agreed before the build. Final price depends on format variety, validation depth, and handoff complexity. FHIR connectors, review UI, and deployment are quoted separately. An intro call gives a range; the domain validation pass fixes scope before contract.
Typical delivery is 3+ weeks after contract and first milestone payment for one focused task and a defined handoff path. More document types, clinical rules, or integrations take longer. The domain validation pass usually runs for a few days before the paid build is contracted.
The module price covers normalization, domain validation, confidence routing, structured handoff on agreed scope, and audit logging. LIMS vendor fees, custom review UI, FHIR deployment, and validation documentation (IQ/OQ) are separate unless scoped. See Integrations & UI on this page.
Yes, when APIs or export formats are available. We map output fields to your schema and deliver via REST or file handoff. Net-new LIMS customization beyond agreed connectors is a separate integration phase.
We design for GxP-aware workflows: audit trails, access controls, and human oversight on critical outputs. Formal validation (IQ/OQ/PQ) and Part 11 qualification depend on your deployment and QMS; we align technical design to your validation plan in scope.
Rights are defined in the contract before work starts: full buyout or a license for your deployment, with different pricing for each. Module pricing reflects scope fit and reuse of proven pipeline components from prior deliveries, not a greenfield six-figure build from scratch.
A healthtech blood test interpretation platform improved recognition stability from 82% to 98%, reached 99% clinical interpretation accuracy on evaluation sets, and helped the startup close a seven-figure round with GDPR and HIPAA-aligned architecture. Case study: r-sun.ai/cases/healthtech-blood-test-ai.
Or email [email protected]